Исходное сообщение
"...а вот к тому, что minix irrelevant" Отправлено gvy, 01-Фев-07 18:52
О, а вот и иллюстрация к уже сказанному где-то насчёт того, что MINIX есть и без изменений в подходе к разработке останется никому не нужной игрушкой (и в embedded тоже): --- I was convinced by ast's comments for a while until I wanted to contribute there. I'd hacked on the Hurd for a while and was thinking that it would be nice to work on a project that actually had momentum. There are a series of things that kept me from going further: * A strong resistance of things GPL. To the point where they're not really interested in hearing about bugs compiling things like coreutils. * A strong rejection of testsuites. They said that they would accept tests, but that if a test ever broke, the test would simply be removed. One of the things that I think is mostly interesting about the Minix architecture is that so much of the system could be build-time tested while being built as a regular user. * Private development model. Discussions happen around their lab rather than on lists and newsgroups. I started working on an ELF interpretor only to be told that a core dev was reworking this file, and that I should come back in a few months. I still argue that the Microkernel debate was never lost - simply that to this day, no real contender has ever shown up. --- http://lwn.net/Articles/218353/ И именно открытость разработки при адекватном управлении процессом и есть, наверное, главное достижение Linux как free software project.  Кто этого ещё не понял -- ССЗБ ;-)

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	> О, а вот и иллюстрация к уже сказанному где-то насчёт того, что > MINIX есть и без изменений в подходе к разработке останется никому > не нужной игрушкой (и в embedded тоже): > --- > I was convinced by ast's comments for a while until I > wanted to contribute there. I'd hacked on the Hurd for a > while and was thinking that it would be nice to work > on a project that actually had momentum. > There are a series of things that kept me from going further: > * A strong resistance of things GPL. To the point where they're > not really interested in hearing about bugs compiling things like coreutils. > * A strong rejection of testsuites. They said that they would accept > tests, but that if a test ever broke, the test would > simply be removed. One of the things that I think is > mostly interesting about the Minix architecture is that so much of > the system could be build-time tested while being built as a > regular user. > * Private development model. Discussions happen around their lab rather than on > lists and newsgroups. I started working on an ELF interpretor only > to be told that a core dev was reworking this file, > and that I should come back in a few months. > I still argue that the Microkernel debate was never lost - simply > that to this day, no real contender has ever shown up. > --- http://lwn.net/Articles/218353/ > И именно открытость разработки при адекватном управлении процессом и есть, наверное, главное > достижение Linux как free software project. Кто этого ещё не > понял -- ССЗБ ;-)
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: