Исходное сообщение
"Microsoft присоединился к организации LOT Network, защищающе..." Отправлено Andrey Mitrofanov, 05-Окт-18 11:00
> Так оно само - патентный тролль. EEE в действии. Не "оно само", а "оне обе" ж, и микрософт(*) и эта "сеть". Хотя камрад Шестовиц классифицирует эти OIN-о-подобные вымогательства отдельно.  Сорта субстанций...   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/111203.html#11 "" Protection Money and the Vigilante Non-Solution The solutions proposed by patent maximalists are not solutions but merely additions to the problem. ‘Protection money’ and vigilantes in the patent world don’t make anyone any safer (overall), but this is what IAM is proposing in this article. To quote: “As a network designed to provide coverage from patent suits, Freedom has some obvious parallels with the License on Transfer Network (LOTNet). LOTNet was launched in 2014 by a group of operating companies led by Google. Those that join agree that if they transfer any patents to an NPE then the other members of the network automatically receive a licence to those patents. This is in large part because the vast majority of NPE lawsuits involve patents developed and filed by operating companies.” There is actually one such patent vigilante that calls itself “Freedom”? All that these things are doing is patent tax collection, like a vigilante knocking on every door to collect money for the vigilante that’s supposedly intended to protect from the patent Mafia. Therein lies exacerbation of the issues/problem, but then again, when you’re a patent lawyer, it’s “mo’ problems, mo’ money.” █ "" --http://techrights.org/2016/02/29/reform-debate-gone-awry/ (*)   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/110798.html#36   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/111315.html#53   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/108571.html#72   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/107047.html#146   https://www.opennet.ru/openforum/vsluhforumID3/108187.html#50