Исходное сообщение
"Оценка безопасности различных дистрибутивов Linux " Отправлено prapor, 13-Сен-10 17:34
Да результат не сильно отличился. 2.6.32-44.2.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 21 12:48:32 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Executable anonymous mapping             : Killed Executable bss                           : Killed Executable data                          : Killed Executable heap                          : Killed Executable stack                         : Killed Executable shared library bss            : Killed Executable shared library data           : Killed Executable anonymous mapping (mprotect)  : Vulnerable Executable bss (mprotect)                : Vulnerable Executable data (mprotect)               : Vulnerable Executable heap (mprotect)               : Killed Executable stack (mprotect)              : Vulnerable Executable shared library bss (mprotect) : Vulnerable Executable shared library data (mprotect): Vulnerable Writable text segments                   : Vulnerable Anonymous mapping randomisation test     : 28 bits (guessed) Heap randomisation test (ET_EXEC)        : 14 bits (guessed) Heap randomisation test (PIE)            : 28 bits (guessed) Main executable randomisation (ET_EXEC)  : No randomisation Main executable randomisation (PIE)      : 28 bits (guessed) Shared library randomisation test        : No randomisation Stack randomisation test (SEGMEXEC)      : 28 bits (guessed) Stack randomisation test (PAGEEXEC)      : 28 bits (guessed) Return to function (strcpy)              : paxtest: return address contains a NULL byte. Return to function (memcpy)              : Vulnerable Return to function (strcpy, PIE)         : paxtest: return address contains a NULL byte. Return to function (memcpy, PIE)         : Vulnerable Но в общем таки можно его силами прикрыться.