Исходное сообщение
"8 июня будет проведён день всемирного тестирования IPv6" Отправлено Аноним, 15-Янв-11 09:39
> А попроще можно? > Своими словами, и без зубодробительной терминологии? > Типа такого: > - IPv6 позволит сократить объём служебного трафика > - IPv6 упрощает маршрутизацию > & c.t.r. IPv6 myths http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/02/ipv6-myths.html?utm_source... IPv6 provides service/location separation. Total nonsense. The only mechanism used to find services is still DNS and it’s still used from the wrong position in the protocol stack. IPv6 will reduce IP routing tables. Not true. IETF had 15 years to solve multihoming issues, but failed to do so. SHIM, SCTP ... are still in a very experimental stage. If anything, the situation will only get worse, as everyone will try to get PI address space. IPv6 will reduce BGP problems. Just the opposite. Not only will the size of the IPv6 global routing table increase, IPv6 BGP tables use more space (and more bandwidth) than the corresponding IPv4 BGP tables. IPv6 has better quality of service. Total nonsense; the only widespread QoS mechanism is DiffServ that uses DSCP. IPv6 has better security. Not true. IPSec might be better integrated in IPv6 headers, but there’s nothing you can do with IPv6 IPSec that you cannot do with IPv4 IPSec. Residential IPv6 is less secure because it does not require NAT. Anyone who thinks NAT is a security feature deserves to become part of a botnet.

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	>> А попроще можно? >> Своими словами, и без зубодробительной терминологии? >> Типа такого: >> - IPv6 позволит сократить объём служебного трафика >> - IPv6 упрощает маршрутизацию >> & c.t.r. > IPv6 myths > http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/02/ipv6-myths.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=IOS+hints+Feed > IPv6 provides service/location separation. Total nonsense. The only mechanism used to find > services is still DNS and it’s still used from the wrong > position in the protocol stack. > IPv6 will reduce IP routing tables. Not true. IETF had 15 years > to solve multihoming issues, but failed to do so. SHIM, SCTP > ... are still in a very experimental stage. If anything, the > situation will only get worse, as everyone will try to get > PI address space. > IPv6 will reduce BGP problems. Just the opposite. Not only will the > size of the IPv6 global routing table increase, IPv6 BGP tables > use more space (and more bandwidth) than the corresponding IPv4 BGP > tables. > IPv6 has better quality of service. Total nonsense; the only widespread QoS > mechanism is DiffServ that uses DSCP. > IPv6 has better security. Not true. IPSec might be better integrated in > IPv6 headers, but there’s nothing you can do with IPv6 IPSec > that you cannot do with IPv4 IPSec. > Residential IPv6 is less secure because it does not require NAT. Anyone > who thinks NAT is a security feature deserves to become part > of a botnet.
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: